Home Blog Page 53

IFM, MicroLogix 1100 – Encoder to HSC (S49A)

Learn how to connect and use an Encoder with a MicroLogix 1100 and High Speed Counter function in this episode of The Automation Show.

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.



The Automation Show, Episode 49A Show Notes:

A huge thank you to IFM for sending in the RVP510 Encoder for us to use on the Show!


Support our site and get early access to our videos, free downloads and more!

You can now support our site with a small monthly pledge and in turn receive instant rewards! To find out more visit https:// TheAutomationBlog.com/join.

You can also purchase the entire season of The Automation Show for a one time donation of $30 at https://vimeo.com/ondemand/theautomationshow.

Thanks in advance for your support!

Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Show, Podcast, and Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

Insider News for September


Note: Insider News articles & videos cover behind the scenes topics at The Automation Blog, Podcast & Show. Starting in 2021 they’re now posted at http:// TheAutomationBlog.com/join

Insider News for September, 2020

Thank you all for your continued support!

I hope everyone is staying safe and healthy during these trying times!


Insider Update Video for August, 2020


Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar


Point I/O – Getting Started


There are many options for field I/O on the market, between vendors and sometimes even many different I/O options within a single vendor as is the case with Allen Bradley.

With the ControlLogix platform, you can use remote 1756 I/O (ControlLogix Chassis), 1794 I/O (Flex I/O Chassis) or 1734 I/O (Point I/O Chassis).

Each one of the available options can have benefit or meet your needs in a different way, but for this article I will focus on 1734 Point I/O and hopefully share some setup tips if you are planning an installation.

Image by: Brandon Cooper – Point_IO.jpg

Communications Adapters

The Point I/O family can utilize ControlNet, DeviceNet, EtherNet or Profibus communication adapters.

This makes integration to almost any current configuration you may have, although if it were a new installation, I would go with Ethernet as the 1734-AENTR supports DLR (Device Level Ring) Topology.

Cabinet Space

The small footprint of the 1734 I/O chassis and modules is one of the key benefits of selecting Point I/O for your installation as it will fit in small, remote cabinets.

Their modular configuration allows to only implement what you need and add more modules later if needed. A chassis can support up to sixty-three modules, so they are very flexible (although you must still consider module density when counting I/O).

Cost

If you compare say, a 1756-IA16 module cost to a 1734-IA4 module, the cost is about five times the amount. However, if you need sixteen channels and buy four of the 1734 input modules, there is not much difference in the cost, but many other considerations such as prewired cables and IFM’s can drive up the 1756 cost more if you are going that route.

All in all, there is not a significant cost difference in the I/O modules if you are looking at cost for your design, but there are so many considerations to consider, it would take a volume to cover them all.

Image by: Brandon Cooper – 1734.jpg

Tips for Setting up Point I/O, Keying Modules

When you are installing 1734 I/O Modules, you will notice that most modules will use the same backplane modules.

They are “keyed” for each different type of module during installation. For instance, a 1734-IA2 module has a key position of 8 and a 1734-IB2 module has a key position of 1. For a complete list, reference:

Image by: Brandon Cooper – Module_Key.jpg

Image by: Brandon Cooper – Backplane_Key.jpg

Setting Chassis Size in AENTR Module

On initial setup of a 1734-AENTR, you will find that all modules in the I/O Chassis will not communicate in the Studio 5000 I/O Tree.

Initially, you will have go to the “Chassis Size” tab as shown below and click the “Set Chassis Size in Module” button to download to the 1734-AENTR module.

Once the chassis size matches the actual, then the I/O modules will be allowed to communicate.

Image by: Brandon Cooper – Chassis_Size.png

Conclusion

My initial interactions with Point I/O have been positive and setup is very straight-forward. Another consideration to remember is to go to Rockwell’s PCDC (Product Compatibility and Download Center) and download all needed Add-On Profiles for your project.

Hope you picked up a couple of tips here and my best to you to make 1734 I/O a component of your systems.

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

Choosing The Right Ethernet Switch

Like many other people that work in controls and automation, I came from an electrical and instrumentation background and did not have any experience with network design, configuration or maintenance.

Thankfully, my first job was a mill startup and I was able to learn many things that would be a foundation for the years ahead. Things like how to test and terminate fiber and UTP (unshielded twisted pair) for EtherNet communication.

Above: Scalance Unmanaged and Managed Industrial Switches.
Image By Shawn Tierney. Special thanks to Siemens for the samples.

Soon thereafter, I would have to learn how to load switch backups to replace a failed switch. The list goes on, but as the needs for network skills have increased over the years, I have had to create a constant plan of learning to keep up with the direction of the industry.

There are so many options on the market today for network switching devices. If you plan to implement a new switch for a small system or are planning an entire network, where do you start?

Image by: Brandon Cooper

Vendor Considerations

Whether you are using ABB, Honeywell, Rockwell, Siemens, Emerson or any other control system or systems in your install base, they will all have a preferred line of network equipment that they have tested and approved for their respective systems.

The said company will also have network design considerations that are approved and tested as well.

It doesn’t mean other types of “non-approved” network equipment will not work with their control system, only that they have not been tested and guaranteed. Company specific documentation is the first place I would begin when planning for a network.

Scalability

Thinking about setting up a new control system and you need to install new network equipment for the system. Ask yourself a few questions:

  • Will this system be isolated from other systems (aka stand-alone) or will it be part of a larger, overall network?
  • What are the plans for the future of this system? Will it be part of a larger network one day?
  • What are the security risks for this system?

Asking yourself the above questions will help you with the decision of whether you will need a managed switch or unmanaged switch.

Some considerations of a Managed Switch:

  • Network configuration allows for traffic segregation for multiple networks (VLANS)
  • Remote access for switch monitoring and configuration
  • Security features like being able to disable ports, detecting unauthorized access and a myriad of other security functions
  • Capable of providing diagnostic data to OT systems and IIoT systems
  • Capable of Fault Tolerant, Redundant and Ring Topologies
  • Requires specific skillset for setting up and maintenance
  • More expensive

Some considerations of an Unmanaged Switch:

  • No configuration necessary
  • Access devices are essentially plug and play
  • Inexpensive
  • Higher security risk potential

Other Considerations

Redundancy

Depending on the criticality of this device:

    • Does it need to be redundant?
    • Does it support network redundancy?
    • Does it support redundant power supplies?

Devices that support network redundancy and power redundancy will be higher end devices.

They will cost more, be managed and can be industrial grade, but will provide the uptime needed if the device is critical.

Environment

Is an industrial grade switch needed?

    • Will this device be in a cabinet that can and will be locked?
    • Will this device be in an air-purified environment or a harsh environment?

If the device cannot be locked up, the security risk is greater and if the device is in a harsh environment, it needs to be industrial grade.

Image by: Brandon Cooper

 Conclusion

There are many variables to take into consideration when looking for a network switch to meet your needs.

Generally, the more resilient and configurable, the more the cost will be. The simple, lower cost switch will also meet the needs and perform the required function with much less cost, time and resources.

Whatever your network needs are, I hope this gives you valuable considerations to think about as you plan for your network needs.

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

Data-Driven Decision Making: Driving the Need for Remote Sensors in Manufacturing

Too often, manufacturing and Industry 4.0 are described only in terms of greenfield deployments. Unrealistic and expensive descriptions of shiny new factories outfitted with the latest industrial-internet-of-things (IIoT) technologies to deliver transformational insights are not the reality for most businesses.

For most, the truth is rather different, with manufacturers keen to realize the same value in their existing facilities with existing equipment and retrofitted sensors. Our study found that by combining IIoT/remote sensors, machine learning, and analytics as part of a comprehensive maintenance strategy, manufacturers can extend and enhance the life of their expensive assets for years to come.

Most manufacturers simply cannot afford to refresh all of their machines just because something new comes along. They need to work with the existing investments with the plan to add sensors to gain additional value from their machinery without the cost of replacing it.

Eighty-one percent of decision makers say extending the life of their equipment would save them money. The use of IIoT sensors is critical to meeting this goal, as these sensors provide data on the way in which machines are being used. The efficiency gained through proactive maintenance can help the near half (46%) of respondents’ firms in our study that retire their equipment prematurely.

Currently, more than a quarter of decision makers say their organizations are using a data-driven approach to machine maintenance through predictive maintenance practices. Eighty-

five percent of respondents agree that IIoT/remote sensors will be widely used in equipment service within five years. This shift to data-driven machine maintenance is critical to achieving better insights through data. Decision makers must ask themselves if their firms have the technology and staff in place to gather and act on the insights from their data.

Manufacturers are getting serious about the importance of becoming data-driven and are willing to dedicate the time and money to do it, with half of leaders in this study reporting an increase in maintenance-related programs/technology budgets in 2020. Seventy-seven percent of decision makers agree that using emerging technologies in combination with data insights maximizes the success of their digital initiatives, justifying the increase in funding. Even more compelling: 79% of respondents say using emerging technologies and data insights puts them ahead of the competition.

For more information, continue reading our informational infographic below!

 

Written by Jeff Kosiorek
Vice President and CMO for Advanced Technology Services, Inc.

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

SIMATIC Real-Time Locating Systems (P61)

Learn about the Industrial Applications for Real-Time Locating Systems, which now include Contact Tracing and Social Distancing Alerts, in this episode of The Automation Podcast

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.


Watch the Podcast:



The Automation Podcast is also available on most Video and Podcasting platforms, and direct links to each can be found here.


Listen to the Podcast:


The Automation Podcast, Episode 61 Show Notes:

Special thanks to Nicole Lauther from Siemens for taking the time to review the many industrial applications for Real-Time Locating Systems, including Contact Tracing and Social Distancing Alerts.

To find out more, check out the below links:


Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Podcast, Show or Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

Talking Legacy: ProSoft Communication Solutions

Deciding how to communicate across multiple systems and vendors can be a research project itself. The protocols on both sides of the equation must be evaluated and even the data structures and data types must be taken into consideration.

In some instances, vendors do not have direct options to communicate with other vendors entirely and a third-party bridge device must be used for the communications gap.

Image by: Brandon Cooper

Prosoft is a company that specializes in these types of communication bridge devices. They make many modules that fit into a ControlLogix backplane that will communicate with other systems such as Profibus Scanners for systems like Siemen’s I/O.

They also have a PMIO scanner that will communicate with Honeywell PMIO, and make several Modbus devices as well and a myriad of other communications bridge devices for ControlLogix systems.

Note: Over the years we’ve used many of ProSoft’s products, and we’ll continue to reach out to ProSoft for samples to feature in our how-to articles and videos – Ed.

EtherNet I/P to DF1

Prosoft now has an external product that can be used to bridge the gap between an EtherNet I/P communicating control system and a serial communicating control system interface.

This can allow communication across systems of several decades to take place. On the EtherNet I/P side, it also supports Redundant ControlLogix Controllers.

The PLX51-DF1-ENI module can accomplish just this. Setup is simple an the device does require an external 24vdc power supply so keep this in mind.

Image by: Brandon Cooper

Image by: Brandon Cooper

Note: Be sure to check out our previous coverage of ANC and RTA who have very similar products – Ed.

Architecture Potentials

With these types of bridging devices, the potentials for communications to all types of systems can be accomplished, especially for use in ControlLogix.

With some of the above mentioned products, you can potentially use a ControlLogix controller and the other individual specific network devices to communicate with Siemen’s Profibus I/O, a 1771 Remote I/O chassis, 1756 I/O chassis, a bridge to a legacy system with serial communication and a communication piece to a Modbus control system.

Even in another slot, the PMIO scanner could be monitoring or controlling Honeywell PMI/O. Not to mention, there could be so much more added to this system.

This kind of flexibility was unheard of not many years ago.

Conclusion

There are so many vendors, products, and protocols on the market today. They need to communicate with one another, with SCADA and HMI systems and ultimately data historians and other IIoT systems.

There is no “one size fits all” and every system has different requirements and protocols. Researching, testing and implementation of various products takes time and commitment to bring your systems into harmony with one another.

I recommend to contact your vendor specific sales people as well as these third party companies and let them know your needs and to update you when the newest “toys” become available. My best to you in creating system harmony in your OT systems.

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

TIA Portal, S7-1200 – Signal Modules: First Time Using (S48)

Learn how to add and use Siemens S7-1200 Signal Modules in this episode of The Automation Show.

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.



The Automation Show, Episode 48 Show Notes:

A huge thank you to Siemens for sending in the S7-1200 modules for us to use on the Show!


Support our site and get early access to our videos, free downloads and more!

You can now support our site with a small monthly pledge and in turn receive instant rewards! To find out more visit https:// TheAutomationBlog.com/join.

You can also purchase the entire season of The Automation Show for a one time donation of $30 at https://vimeo.com/ondemand/theautomationshow.

Thanks in advance for your support!

Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Show, Podcast, and Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

Air Amplification Technologies For Automation (P60)

Learn about air amplification technologies used in blow-off and cooling applications in this episode of The Automation Podcast

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.


Watch the Podcast:



The Automation Podcast is also available on most Video and Podcasting platforms, and direct links to each can be found here.


Listen to the Podcast:


The Automation Podcast, Episode 60 Show Notes:

Special thanks to Les Rapchak for taking the time to review the many air amplification technologies used today in automated systems.

Topic List:

    • 02:12 What is Air Amplification
    • 04:53 Compressed air vs blowers
    • 08:12 Replacing crimped pipes/tubes
    • 11:19 Air Nozzles
    • 17:04 Air Jets
    • 21:47 Air Edgers
    • 26:07 Manifold Systems
    • 27:21 Air Amplifiers/Air Movers
    • 39:50 Air Knives
    • 51:25 Air Blade Ionizers
    • 54:45 Ion Blaster Beam
    • 56:24 Ring Blade Air Wipe

To find out more:

Nex Flow Air Products Corp.
Servicing the world with locations in north America, Europe and SE Asia plus agents and distributors around the globe
Website: https://nexflow.com
Les Rapchak, President
Email: lesr “at” nexflow.com


Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Podcast, Show or Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

Talking Legacy: Taking Intermediate Steps in Control System Upgrades

One of my favorite tasks in the world of automation is upgrading legacy control systems to newer systems.

Many a time the legacy system contains a less than desirable option for communications with other systems. In today’s world, systems must communicate with one another and ultimately the data must be made accessible to IIoT systems.

If the data doesn’t become accessible, companies cannot make use of it in their critical decision making for production, logistics, quality and a myriad of other reasons.

Image by: Brandon Cooper

During some upgrades, we simply cannot upgrade an entire system at once and it must be accomplished in pieces. We choose to upgrade the processor and or communication pieces of the control system so that protocols such as EtherNet I/P can be used instead of a serial or Highway type of communication. There can be many reasons for upgrading only a piece of the system and they can include cutover time, costs and other constraints.

Cutover Time

If you only have a small window to cutover a system to a new system and do not have time to rewire the I/O or even install conversion hardware, then this would be a time that you could only upgrade the processor or communication pieces of a system. Depending on the circumstances, processors can be swapped over in as little as half an hour.

Costs

If the budget only allows for processors, then you do what you can and that is eat the elephant one bite at a time.

Examples

Rockwell Automation has evolved their control systems from systems including Reliance Automax and Allen Bradley PLC to their ControlLogix Platform. However, they did not leave their legacy systems behind completely. They still have communication modules such as a 1756-DHRIO module that will communicate over Data Highway to various other PLC’s and devices as well as used to control 1771 I/O modules. In this scenario, a ControlLogix Processor can communicate through a 1756-DHRIO module to a 1771 chassis and control the legacy I/O as an intermediate step of upgrading a system without upgrading the I/O.

Honeywell has never left their legacy systems either. Conversion kits can be bought to communicate with the oldest Multifunction Controller systems to the TDC 3000 systems all the way to Experion Controllers. The Experion C300 controllers utilize two I/O Links (grey and violet) for I/O systems. Typically, the grey I/O link is utilized for series C I/O and the violet I/O link is utilized for PMIO (Legacy TDC3000 I/O).

Image by: Brandon Cooper

Conclusion

With decades of different, evolving, but robust control system equipment in place, companies have had to deal with keeping all or some of their legacy systems in place. The I/O for instance, are usually supported much longer than the controllers themselves. This gives more opportunity to upgrade systems in stages rather than all at once. It will be interesting to see with the next systems that are introduced, how they will still communicate with the oldest of their systems.

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

IFM – Temperature Sensor: Setup, Wire, Use with S7-1500, CompactLogix (S47)


In this episode of The Automation Show I setup a new IFM TN2511 Temperature Sensor, then wire it up to both a S7-1500 and CompactLogix to test it out.

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.



The Automation Show, Episode 47 Show Notes:

A huge thank you to IFM for sending in the TN2511 Sensor and cable!

Link to User Manual:


Support our site and get early access to our videos, free downloads and more!

You can now support our site with a small monthly pledge and in turn receive instant rewards! To find out more visit https:// TheAutomationBlog.com/join.

You can also purchase the entire season of The Automation Show for a one time donation of $30 at https://vimeo.com/ondemand/theautomationshow.

Thanks in advance for your support!

Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Show, Podcast, and Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

Honeywell C200 Upgrade Paths

In 1998, Honeywell introduced the Experion Process Knowledge System (EPKS) C200 Controller.

This was a much different system than the TDC 3000 DCS that was released in 1985, and created a much more “open” platform for integration with other products and vendors.

Image by Brandon Cooper: Honeywell C200

The C200 stayed in operation until its end of life in 2019, and even though some support still exists, you cannot buy a new controller.

This created the need for many to find an upgrade path forward, and today we’ll take a look at the features of the two paths Honeywell offers today (C300 & UOC.).

Features that the C300 and UOC controllers both support:

  • Run the Control Execution Environment (CEE)
  • UOC and C300 can talk peer to peer with one another
  • Redundant Controllers
  • Series A I/O & DeviceNet
  • FTE Communication to Layer 2 Switches

Features that Only the C300 Controller Supports:

  • Supports PMIO (TDC 3000 series I/O)
  • Redundant I/O

Features that Only the UOC Controller Supports:

  • Retain Downlink ControlNet to Series A I/O
  • Virtual Controller

Image by Brandon Cooper: Honeywell C300

Other Considerations

  • Remote I/O Communication Differences: Both the C300 and UOC will communicate with series A I/O in different topologies
    • C300: Places Honeywell FTEB modules in remote downlink chassis with FTE communication to a CF9 Firewall
    • UOC: Places Rockwell 1756-EN2TR modules in remote downlink chassis with DLR network topology
  • Series A I/O Replacement: Beginning with Release R432, Honeywell allows the replacement of Series A I/O with Rockwell 1756 I/O. By 2022, the standard replacement for all series A I/O will be Rockwell 1756 I/O modules.
  • Series A I/O Footprint: Uses the same footprint as Rockwell’s ControlLogix, so the same chassis and power supplies are interchangeable with 1756 models.

Conclusion:

If you have a large install base of Honeywell C200 controllers, you most likely know that they are at end of life and parts will be made from un-obtain-ium as time goes on.

As you plan your migration or upgrade path, hopefully this will give you some things to ponder. The best fit for upgrade will most likely lie in what type of I/O the C200 controller is controlling.

If you have PMIO, then no doubt, you will be going to a C300. If you have only Series A I/O, then the UOC with DLR might be the way you would want to proceed.

Another consideration is the other systems in the mill and the spare parts that you want to keep.

My best to you in your planned upgrades ahead.

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

Scalance Unmanaged Industrial Switches (P59)

In this episode of The Automation Podcast, I sit down with Ford Cheeseman to learn about the Siemens Scalance line of Layer 2 Unmanaged Industrial Switches:

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.


Watch the Podcast:



The Automation Podcast is also available on most Video and Podcasting platforms, and direct links to each can be found here.


Listen to the Podcast:


The Automation Podcast, Episode 59 Show Notes:

Special thanks to Ford Cheeseman of Siemens for taking the time to review the Scalance Switche line with us!

To find out more about these products, see the below links:


Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Podcast, Show or Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

Insider News for July and August


Note: Insider News articles & videos cover behind the scenes topics at The Automation Blog, Podcast & Show. Starting in 2021 they’re now posted at http:// TheAutomationBlog.com/join

Insider News for July and August, 2020

Thank you all for your continued support!

I hope everyone is staying safe and healthy during these trying times!

This month’s insider news is for both July and August:


Insider Update Video for August, 2020


Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar


Wago PLC: First Time Programming (S46)

I program my first Wago PLC in this episode of The Automation Show.

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.



The Automation Show, Episode 46 Show Notes:

A huge thank you to Wago for sending in the PLC Starter Kit!

Link to Wago PLC Starter Kit unboxing video:


Support our site and get early access to our videos, free downloads and more!

You can now support our site with a small monthly pledge and in turn receive instant rewards! To find out more visit https:// TheAutomationBlog.com/join.

You can also purchase the entire season of The Automation Show for a one time donation of $30 at https://vimeo.com/ondemand/theautomationshow.

Thanks in advance for your support!

Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Show, Podcast, and Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

What Is IO-Link, and Why Use It? (P58)

In this episode of The Automation Podcast, I sit down with Yuen Li from IFM Efector to learn what IOLink is, and why you should consider using it on your next project:

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.


Watch the Podcast:



The Automation Podcast is also available on most Video and Podcasting platforms, and direct links to each can be found here.


Listen to the Podcast:


The Automation Podcast, Episode 58 Show Notes:

Special thanks to Yuen Li from IFM Efector for taking the time to review IOLink with us!

To find out more about these products, see the below links:


Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Podcast, Show or Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

The Future of Control Systems: One Engineer’s Perspective

Where is technology headed in the world of controls and automation? What will the job of an automation and controls engineer look like in the years ahead?

A little warning, thinking about what awaits ahead can create negative feelings of anxiety or fill you with positive motivation thinking about the toys you will get to play with one day.

Servers – Image by Brandon Cooper

Job Skillsets

While a large percentage of control and automation engineers came from an electrical or instrumentation background, the future will see a larger percentage from a computer science or cyber security discipline background.

They will be managing OT networks from a configuration, security and maintenance perspective. They will also be configuring and maintaining the large deployments of virtual servers, workstations and even controllers and network equipment that lives in the local or remote cloud environments that operate a facility.

While not the current normal, virtual PLC and DCS controllers will begin to become an installed reality and only local I/O near machines will be present. Even most I/O will be non-existent from a wiring perspective, because every device will be Ethernet.

Currently most control systems are still using fast Ethernet or gigabit Ethernet for control systems while IT systems my utilize forty GBPS or even four hundred GBPS. It will not be many years before one TBPS will be present and utilized for enormous amounts of data coming from the smartest of devices such as drives and smarter I/O devices than have ever been introduced.

I would suggest that preventive diagnostics and machine monitoring for predictive failure will see advances that will create jobs for those who have the skillsets to capture, monitor and manipulate the data.

Logistics

Remote capabilities have changed many aspects of an engineer’s life the last 5-10 years. Supporting a facility used to mean being at the facility all kinds of hours, staying for maintenance and startups and called in for downtime events.

Today however, systems are supported from anywhere an internet connection is available. Since the pandemic of 2020, we are seeing more engineers working from home or remotely than ever before.

I submit to you in the future, almost all work will be done remotely, even from the standpoint of engineers supporting multiple facilities within the same company.

There will also be some outsourcing of both IT and OT systems, but unless the outsourcing company has in depth knowledge of the facilities they support, it will not go well. Companies will still need their own engineers with intimate knowledge of their facilities to give them the support that they need.

Waiting for an escalation of a downtime event through a support call will not be acceptable. You will most likely see companies implement more of a central support center for multiple facilities to support them with still one or two people handling hardware support on site, depending on the facility size of course.

Operations of a facility will likely also contain one or two control rooms for an entire facility instead of smaller rooms spread out all over the facility and many functions at a facility will likely be done from a remote site as well, unfortunately for many, needing much less manpower for operations.

Conclusion:

I believe we are still many years away from working in totally virtual control and automation environments. For the next decade at least, a control engineer can plan on supporting equipment that could be three or four decades old, right along side of the newest virtual controller running a new machine.

I believe it will be a slow change, but we better all be learning to work with virtual environments because it will be here to stay. Lots of hardware spread out over a facility will be a thing of the past.

But I will also bet, that you can find a facility in twenty years, that still has a PLC-5 running some arbitrary piece of equipment, because it has ran so well for so long, no one even remembered it was there.

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 


TIA Portal, S7-1500 – Wire, Program, Download, Test a New Program (S45)

In this episode of The Automation Show I wire and program my first Siemens S7-1500 PLC.

For more information, check out the “Show Notes” located below the video.



The Automation Show, Episode 45 Show Notes:

A huge thank you to Siemens for sending in the S7-1500 Starter Kit!

Link to S7-1500 Starter Kit unboxing video:


Support our site and get early access to our videos, free downloads and more!

You can now support our site with a small monthly pledge and in turn receive instant rewards! To find out more visit https:// TheAutomationBlog.com/join.

You can also purchase the entire season of The Automation Show for a one time donation of $30 at https://vimeo.com/ondemand/theautomationshow.

Thanks in advance for your support!

Vendors: Would you like your product featured on the Show, Podcast, and Blog? If you would, please contact me at: https://theautomationblog.com/contact

Until next time, Peace ✌️ 

If you enjoy this episode please give it a Like, and consider Sharing as this is the best way for us to find new guests to come on the show.

Shawn M Tierney
Technology Enthusiast & Content Creator

Eliminate commercials and gain access to my weekly full length hands-on, news, and Q&A sessions by becoming a member at The Automation Blog or on YouTube. You'll also find all of my affordable PLC, HMI, and SCADA courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

shawntierney avatar

Control System Changes Over The Last Five Decades

In part four of this series we will look at modern control systems from both their beginnings, as well as, the progress to what they are capable of at present day.

Today’s engineer can typically work on multiple systems on any given day that could have been installed in the last month, a decade ago, or even thirty years ago.

With this wide band of technology, many companies face skill gaps in their workforce. It is advantageous for all of us to learn older technologies, stay current in our skills and be learning the skills we will need in the next decade.


1970’s

In 1975, Honeywell released their TDC 2000 DCS (Distributed Control System),  Yokagawa the CENTUM system and  Bristol released the UCS 3000 system.

Over the next few years, companies like Valmet, Bailey and Fischer & Porter would join the venture into DCS systems as well. (Ref-1)

The TDC 2000 in-particular had a configuration where a controller would control up to eight control loops (inputs and outputs) on one controller board. The controller board was connected to a Data Highway and the data was made available to a process computer.

Operators could then read process data and write data such as setpoints and outputs to the controllers. This allowed operations to monitor and tune many control loops in a single system. Early highway communications were made available on coaxial cable networks.

(several major manufacturers also released PLCs during the 1970’s, including Modicon, Allen-Bradley, GE – ed.)

1980’s

Improvements were being made to coaxial networks including the Token-Ring technologies as well as the introduction of Ethernet communications that initially used coax and competition between the networks ensued for most of the decade and ended with Ethernet technologies taking over the preferred communications protocol.

Ethernet became even more prevalent as the move was made from coax to twisted pair cable around 1990. (Ref-2) Some notable releases in control systems were the TDC 3000 by Honeywell in 1985 and PLC-5 by Allen Bradley in 1986.

Protocols such as RS-232 and Data Highway made it possible for DCS systems to talk to PLC’s as well.

Control Rooms began to change from bench board type controls to computer displays and many times, operations had to use a mixture of the different control types.

3000IO – Image by Brandon Cooper

1990’s

With the rapid increase in Ethernet capabilities, higher speeds such as 10 Megabit, network switching devices and the adoption of the personal computer, many kinds of different types of communication protocols were made available that allowed communication between different types of systems.

Virtually all vendors began releasing the HMI/SCADA (Human Machine Interface/Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) Software that would allow operations to interact with their control systems.

By the end of the 90’s, systems were becoming more “open” to use protocols such as OPC to communicate with each other. Architectures such as client/server started to become a reality and were widely adopted in the early 2000’s.

2000’s

Honeywell begins to move away from the TDC 3000 to their open system “Experion” and companies like Rockwell are moving from the PLC-5 to their “ControlLogix” platform.

Servers and workstations are getting faster and more capable, Ethernet speeds are moving from 10 Megabit to 100 Megabit and even 1 Gigabit.

With the open technologies such as Microsoft Windows, security becomes an issue with these systems.

Instead of engineers needing mostly an electrical or instrumentation background, the networking/IT skillset really starts to be of necessity in the control systems world.

Attribute: By Steag, Germany – Steag, Germany, CC BY-SA 3.0

2010’s

In the last ten years, it is more of the same, smaller and faster, more storage, more speed.

Ethernet capabilities have increased to 10 Gigabit, 100 Gigabit and even 400 Gigabit speeds.

Virtualization technologies have become a normal part of control systems and a steady move in that direction is taking place and will be discussed further in part five of this series.

Conclusion:

You may have started working in the days when Data Highway networks were the normal communication method in control systems, or started like I did at the turn of the century when 100 Megabit Ethernet networks and Server/Client configurations were the normal.

Or maybe you started last year and installed a virtualized controller or server for your first project.

Whatever the stage, there is plenty to learn to maintain the legacy systems and push forward for the next chapter.

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

References:

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_control_system#History
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet#History

The Move from Analog to Digital Control Systems

As we entered the twentieth century, the invention of electricity created previously unknown possibilities to modern technology. Generators and the utility industries began to light city streets as well as homes.

On/Off controls were installed in manufacturing facilities and production began to increase substantially. For instance, the first mass production of the modern automobile came to fruition, the Model “T”, by Henry Ford in 1908.

Image by: Brandon Cooper: Benchboard

Telephone and Communication

In the late 1800s, there was also much pursuit of a “sound telegraph” or “telephone” as we know it today.

In 1907, the triode, vacuum tube device was invented and that brought about automated switch boards for phone systems, however, the larger the systems increased, the larger the demand for electricity became.

By 1929, 30% of telephone switching was automatic. It would be several more decades before the MOSFET transistor would be created and mass produced that would finally get the radio and communications industry the capabilities it needed to become efficient.

This switching technology in the communications industry was the beginning of what would later be the inspiration for the digital computer.  (Ref-1)

Microprocessor

With the discovery of silicon (Si) in 1823, by Jons Jacob Berzelius, another major component was working its way through evolution.

Further work by Tesla’s creation of electrical logic circuits called “gates” or “switches” was another important step.

Finally, the transistor invention beginning around 1947 at Bell Laboratories and improvements upon the transistor for the next decade helped create the first integrated circuits in 1958.

The first microprocessor became commercially available came in 1971 from IBM. (Ref-2)

Looking at this neatly organized relay logic panel, why would you want to replace it with a computer?

Image by: Brandon Cooper: Relays

The First PLC (Programmable Logic Controller)

With the automotive industry in the late 1960s becoming more demanding, the drive for automated control systems brought forth the first PLC created by Bedford Associates and named it the “Modular Digital Controller”.

After its initial success, the company changed its name to Modicon (derived from MODular, DIgital, CONtroller).

This “Logic Controller” was programmable by a Graphical Representation of Boolean Logic, which was much preferred to the Boolean Statements that other control systems at the time were using, since the Graphical Representations  resembled the Electrical Ladder Diagrams that engineers were used to using. (Ref-3)

Conclusion:

From the inception of electrical circuits, technology has never looked back. With each invention or improvement, the capabilities of automated switching devices became more and more a reality.

It was said the first Modicon PLC that operated in General Motors’ plant reduced downtime for the facility by more than 60% in its first year. This was the needed proof of what could be accomplished when controls were handled by a computer.

Troubleshooting was easier and wiring was simplified and over the next decade other competitors such as Allen Bradley began making PLCs and the field began making them faster and more powerful.  (Ref-3)

Written by Brandon Cooper
Senior Controls Engineer and Freelance Writer

Have a question? Join our community of pros to take part in the discussion! You'll also find all of our automation courses at TheAutomationSchool.com.

Sponsor and Advertise: Get your product or service in front of our 75K followers while also supporting independent automation journalism by sponsoring or advertising with us! Learn more in our Media Guide here, or contact us using this form.

shawntierney avatar
 

References:

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone
  2. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microprocessor#Brief_history
  3. https://www.c3controls.com/white-paper/history-of-programmable-logic-controllers/